complex workflow
fintech
Re-Architecting Digital Money Movement for Financial Advisors
Company
LPL Financial
LPL Financial — the largest independent broker-dealer in the United States.
Product Impact
+60%
Task Completion
Product Impact
-20%
NIGO Errors
Product Impact
Simplified money-movement workflows used by 20,000+ financial advisors.
Executive Summary
Scope
Owned end-to-end design of LPL’s money movement system, unifying ACH, wire, and check for 20K+ advisors.
Core Problem
Fragmented workflows across tools limited adoption and increased errors and operational overhead.
Approach
Unified the experience into a single system with smart defaults, real-time validation, and a guided flow to reduce user input and prevent errors.
Impact
Improved user satisfaction and completion rates while reducing errors and operational overhead.
Context & Problem

LPL’s Client Works platform supports high-volume money movement for 20K+ financial advisors, spanning ACH, wire, and check transactions—each with distinct rules and validation requirementsA prior $22M investment focused on ACH—the highest-volume transfer type—but adoption remained low. Advisors still relied on legacy workflows for other transfer types, making 
a standalone solution insufficient despite addressing the largest segment.

Transfer experiences remained fragmented across tools
Required repeated inputs and slowed completion
Errors surfaced only after submission, requiring rework and support volume
Key Decisions
Decision
Majority Use Case Optimization
Save instructions to account owner were not permitted
Insight
90%+ of transfers go 
to account owner
Impact
Reduced input and accelerated completion for the majority of transactions
Decision
Upstream Validation
Embedded real-time validation within the flow to catch errors during entry
Insight
NIGO errors were often caused by missing or incorrect inputs identified after submission
Impact
Reduced errors, rework, and support volume
Decision
Unify Transaction System
Standardized ACH, wire, and check into a single transaction framework
Insight
Inconsistent workflows across transfer types created confusion and slowed task completion
Impact
Improved adoption and reduced tool-switching
Decision
Smart Defaults & Progressive Disclosure
Introduced smart defaults and revealed additional fields only when necessary
Insight
Excess inputs and unclear requirements increased cognitive load
Impact
Simplified high-frequency transactions while supporting complex scenarios
System Design:
Standardizing Transaction Behavior

Standardized transaction behavior across all transfer types through a shared system model.

Core Layers of the System
Input Layer
  • User-provided transaction details
  • Streamlined through smart defaults for common scenarios
Validation Layer
  • Real-time checks for completeness and accuracy
  • Contextual guidance to prevent errors before submission
Routing Layer
  • Determines processing paths based on payee types, and rules
  • Streamlined through smart defaults for common scenarios
Confirmation Layer
  • Clear summary and verification before submission
  • Reinforces confidence in high-stakes actions
Key Shift:
From fragmented, type-specific flows → to a unified system where complexity is handled by the system, not the user.
Final Design

With new standardized experience, the simplest and the most complex experience can be organized in common order and layout, allowing us to optimize familiarity and clarity by modeling the experience after shopping cart.

Results & IMpact

The redesign didn't just modernize an interface — it restored something the legacy experience had quietly eroded: advisor confidence in the platform. Transfers that once required manual follow-up, workarounds, and phone calls to confirm completion could now be executed independently, accurately, and in significantly less time. For advisors managing transfers on behalf of clients, that shift wasn't just operational — it was professional. The platform was finally doing its job so they didn't have to do it for them.

The following results reflect the ACH and Check release. Wire had not yet launched at the time of measurement.

Outcome
Business Impact
~60% increase in task completion
Increased successful transaction conversion
20%+ reduction in NIGO errors
Improved conversion quality and reduced failure rates
Reduced support call volume
Lower friction and improved user confidence
Key Takeaways

Move Money exposed how easily organizations can optimize for the wrong signal. The business initially focused on ACH because it represented the majority of transfers, but advisors rejected the standalone solution since they still needed the legacy system for wires and checks. The metric was right, but the conclusion was wrong. Instead, we focused on what the data actually revealed: 90% of transfers went to account owners, which led us to streamline the primary workflow, unlock saved instructions through compliance partnership, and reduce the experience to the fewest possible inputs.

The project also exposed how averages can hide reality. Initial data suggested advisors had 10–12 saved instructions on average, but most actually had only 1–3, while a small group had more than 50. Designing for the “average” would have optimized for almost no one. Challenging those assumptions helped shape a more scalable experience for the highest-volume transaction workflow at LPL Financial, balancing usability, compliance, and operational reliability in a high-trust financial environment.